Educational Section

General Information:

The educational section will no longer featuring programming, 3d/2d animation, web design, music/video making, etc computer related subject anymore.

It will be solely featuring philosophy and psychology. To be honest, there are literally millions of reason going thru my mind right now about the future of philosophy and psychology I couldn’t possibly explain all of them. Besides…. I am never certainly if my concept is flawed or not disregarding the fact over years of experiments proving the concept to be flawless. I am creating this page wanting the public to flaw my concept, therefore proving the concept to be flawless.
Anyways, this is getting personal and for those who don’t know who I am or never read my book on my website before (the book was removed due to lack of confident by me, but this new page will not be like my first book which failed miserably). I will just tell you few facts that you can of course argue against by sending me a ticket thru support page.
All current human philosophy is flawed due to the exceptions from the society/individual.
Able to define the exception means to be able to define everything about human mind therefore building up a flawless philosophy concept.
Finally I will have to say… It is already possible to define the exception.

I am not going to share anything about my findings to the public yet. It isn’t simple philosophy where people can understand right away just by reading/looking at it. I found it somehow related to psychology in term of defining people’s action. It has been a problem for me trying to isolate personal influence and concept influence to ensure concept itself would be safe.
Lastly, I am a person with great uncertainty. Even though after over 30 people (psychologists, teachers, church mates, philologist, and students) of testing trial to make sure my concept isn’t mad, already existing, flawed. Passing all of the tests, along with months of searching. I am still uncertain.
Alright, let’s get to the topic. This page will be most likely abandoned because I will not be going around advertising, talking or discussing about this page anywhere. It is now pure interest if you are reading the page and decided you wanted to help.

How to help:
How to help is simple. Flaw the quotes I said above:
All current human philosophy is flawed due to the exceptions from the society/individual.
Able to define the exception means to be able to define everything about human mind therefore building up a flawless philosophy concept.

Send me a ticket from support page if you can flaw it with reasoning or else it will be ignored.

I am an uncertain person. I need the public support to push the concept or else everything would be pointless and meaningless for me to share the concept to public.

 

What am I talking about?

Currently I am naming my concept to be value system (book naming was the second definition). It was named second definition because I used to believe it would be the second definition on how people's mind works while the first definition is existing human definition on how it works (I don't include myself within human category due to virtually trying to fight off the external influence, being the middleman). Value system was named due to its functionalities like currency money except it is virtualized by your mind; it have to be a system because it is combination of concepts together.
There are too much to talk about and most of that would be private. Even when I watch a movie I was forced determine the characters in the movie their value aspects therefore further more understanding myself by looking at myself which value aspects I need from others. Anyways, one thing about value system and its usage have been a mystery.
I can only conclude value system is meant for understanding; but the understanding of it will make changes. It is meant for understanding because you can never go against value system’s rules, but you can modify yourself to do the things you want and yet following the rules. Too much secrets than real concept right?
I wish the concept is simple as “survival of the fittest”, people understand it right away. But I flawed that by using some of the exceptions from the society where the fittest people didn’t survive, example would be people who lusts, addicts who waste their life for short term feelings. I am sure they fits into the society just fine, just they aren’t working toward survival; there are much more about life than survival is what I meant. You can of course add definitions to survival of the fittest like for example: those people wouldn’t fit, all because that’s their disadvantage in life. Then it leads back because survival of the fittest no longer held its effect when I am sure survival is no longer a term people work for now; people now days can buy survival thru money or sell their time (survival) for value (Like feeling, money, matters, etc. You will have to use my definition while reading books from me). Fittest no longer survive due to that. Survival of the fittest failed as well.
Little background. I am one of those people who enjoys and good at flawing concepts. I am racist toward flawed concepts due to it is racist itself by isolating the exceptions.

There was a challenge from a forum. Solipsism (idea that only your mind exists, and that everything beyond is uncertain and indefensible) is flawless. I hate to repeat on this page again, but I will provide a brand new answer this time. How you know your mind exists at first place, what evidence you have that everything beyond your mind is uncertain when it surely does to you currently? Did you disassemble yourself to see your brain/mind actually exists? If you never seen it, then I will have to say you are hallucinating it like religion. I will have to bring on one of my king cards when it comes to religion or any other related subjects.
If god exists, then what is its difference from believing rat (example) as gods? If god exists, how can you say there aren’t aliens? They all don’t exist in reality. Everything now exists beyond understanding unlocking the infinity to exist due to the fact you believe everything you think to exist and you can believe anything you like. Sadly, once the infinite is unlocked everything would be flawed because infinity is made from negative to positive; not only they cancel out but also they declare each other to be false. An example of infinity flaw would be: there is god, and then another concept saying there is no god. Since both concepts have the same power and they exist at the same time, it would flaw them both. Everything would go into a loop and flawed. Even my value system will be flawed.
Want an even deeper answer? Don’t get to this step if you have to unlock the infinite while developing a concept. Because it would be the same as millions of other religions, concepts; flawed.
From the explanation above, you might see that I relates math to my concept. That is true. I personally use math concepts to make understanding easier for people other than myself. But don’t expect this to be math class.
That is all I am going to put on this website right now. There are many other explanations like redefinition of love, family, etc but they are nothing compare to definition of human action. Which action includes love, family, etc anyways.